Five years ago, pet insurance as an employee benefit was a curiosity — a perk offered by a small number of pet-friendly employers and largely absent from mainstream benefits packages. In 2026, it is one of the fastest-growing voluntary benefits in the U.S. employer market, offered by a meaningful percentage of large employers and increasingly common in mid-market benefits packages as well. The growth isn't accidental. American pet ownership has expanded substantially, with roughly two-thirds of U.S. households now owning
Read Full Article HereThe conversation about workplace wellness ROI has matured significantly over the past decade, and not in a way that flatters most existing programs. The early era of wellness — anchored in claims that every dollar invested returned three to six dollars in healthcare savings — produced numbers that didn't survive serious academic scrutiny. The peer-reviewed literature, including landmark studies from the University of Chicago and Harvard, has consistently found that the dramatic ROI claims of the 2000s and early
Read Full Article HereThe benefits package designed for a salaried knowledge worker behind a laptop fails predictably when delivered to a warehouse associate, a CNA in a long-term care facility, a delivery driver, a construction worker, or a hospitality worker on a variable schedule. The plan structure, the enrollment process, the communication channels, the claims experience, and the assumptions about how employees access care are all built for a workforce that lives on email, has predictable hours, can take a phone
Read Full Article HereThe default assumption among many small and mid-size employers is that bundling all benefits with a single carrier is simpler, cheaper, and easier to manage. The single-carrier model — medical, dental, vision, life, and disability all from the same insurer — has been the standard offering of national carrier sales teams for decades, and the convenience case for it is real. The cost case is less convincing than it appears. The carrier with the most competitive medical pricing in your
Read Full Article HereA 350-employee company with locations in Atlanta, Phoenix, Boston, and Denver has a problem that doesn't show up on any single line of the income statement but quietly drives material cost and complexity into the benefits program: every market it operates in has different healthcare pricing, different network adequacy, different state insurance regulations, and different employee expectations about what a competitive benefits package looks like. The HR team wants standardized benefits — for fairness, for
Read Full Article HereFor small employers shopping for group health coverage in 2026, the decision between the Affordable Care Act's Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP) and the private small group market is rarely the first question that comes up — and it should be. The choice between these two purchasing channels affects what carriers you can access, what plans you can offer, whether you qualify for the Small Business Health Care Tax Credit, and how much administrative complexity you'll absorb in
Read Full Article HereA 25-person software company competing for the same developer talent as a 5,000-person enterprise does not have the same benefits budget. It rarely has the same HR infrastructure, the same carrier leverage, or the same purchasing power at renewal. What it does have — and what larger employers often don't — is flexibility, speed, and the ability to design a benefits package from scratch rather than defend a legacy structure that nobody particularly likes but everyone is afraid to
Read Full Article HereMost employers receive some version of a claims report from their carrier or TPA at least once a year. A significant number of those reports get reviewed once, briefly, and filed. That's an expensive habit. Claims data is the most direct window into what is actually driving your health plan's costs — not what you budgeted, not what your carrier
Read Full Article HereThe pitch for level-funded health plans is compelling on its face: pay a fixed monthly amount like a fully insured plan, but get access to your claims data, potentially share in the surplus if your employees stay healthy, and avoid the community-rated premium increases that punish well-managed groups on the fully insured market. For the right employer, that pitch is accurate. For the wrong employer, it's a way to take on self-funding risk without fully understanding what that risk means
Read Full Article HereSelf-funding a group health plan puts an employer in the position of insurer — responsible for paying claims as they come in, with direct exposure to every high-cost event that hits the plan. For most employers, that exposure is manageable across the predictable middle of the claims distribution: routine office visits, generic prescriptions, standard outpatient procedures. What it is not designed to absorb without protection is the outlier — the premature infant in the NICU for four months, the
Read Full Article HereWe’re ready to help! Call today: 800-903-6066